I-5 bridge collapse: reflecting on our crumbling infrastructure

The I-5 bridge has collapsed in Washington and there are “vehicles and people [in] the water.” No word yet on casualties, and here’s hoping there are none.

Meanwhile, as bad as I hate to say we told you so, we told you so. Various S&R writers have written about various infrastructure issues in the past, and as the story in Washington unfolds, perhaps there’s some value in pointing our readers to some of the more relevant links.

Dr. Denny from July 2010: Drive with care over those 151,394 obsolete, unsafe bridges

Dr. Denny from August 2010: The nation’s 120,000 dams: Much more inspection, repair needed

Wufnik from last November, post-Sandy: Getting ready for the next disaster

If you’re in the mood read more, sift through our Infrastructure category.

16 comments

  • Bret Higgins's avatar

    Human error, not crumbling infrastructure. Over-sized load clipped the top of the bridge.

    • Samuel Smith's avatar

      I’m wrestling with this. Yeah, I get that if you hit something hard enough it’s going to fall down. But have you ever heard of a truck knocking down a sound bridge before? It may have happened, but I’m not aware of it. I’m going to be interested in whether or not further investigation finds structural issues. Maybe it won’t. But a bridge that old in a nation where we have severe infrastructure issues – you can understand my curiosity.

  • Bret Higgins's avatar

    The last three Bridge issues, well, only three since the referenced articles, were all human error related. One had a ship driven into it, one was repaired badly then failed a short time after, and in this case you had an oversize load hit it at 55+mph. It wasn’t just a truck, there was plenty of mass on that oversize load and if you hit a truss bridge at a pivotal point it’s like a house of cards.

    And I sure do understand. There could well have been structural issues with the bridge preceding the event, but that will be in the records. Whilst repairs and maintenance are being carried out slowly, you can be sure every bridge has been checked by engineers for those faults. Would be interesting to see what comes out in the wash.

    Just glad no one was seriously hurt.

    • Samuel Smith's avatar

      No one hurt – that’s the best news in all of this.

      And a ship hitting a bridge, yeah, that one I get. As I say, I’m not arguing that it isn’t possible.

      But do give that link about the bridges a look, if you haven’t already. In an age of deregulation and a refusal to fund infrastructure, we’re probably well advised to be extra diligent about what we’re being told. Being a bridge inspector has to be a terrible job because there’s not much way of correcting what you know is wrong.

      As I recall, btw, one of the bridges on the danger list is here in Denver. You know the Evans bridge across Santa Fe? Yep. I get nervous every time I go under that thing…..

  • Samuel Smith's avatar

    IF you’re right, I must be thinking of the wrong bridge. Next time I’m down that way I’ll double check and I’ll also see if I can find the list I was looking at.

  • primalnights's avatar

    In the Art of War Sun says that if you try to defend all places all will be weak. This is what’s happened with the US Government. You can’t be everything to all people and have it all work.

Leave a reply to Samuel Smith Cancel reply